British-Indian businessman Raj Kundra has lost a significant legal battle in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, with the court ordering him to pay $4.94 million to Emerging Media Ventures (EMV) in a long-running dispute over the ownership of shares linked to the Rajasthan Royals Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise. The ruling also permanently bars Kundra and his investment vehicle, Kuki Investments, from pursuing related legal proceedings outside England, including before India’s National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

The judgment marks a major victory for EMV, the investment firm controlled by British entrepreneur Manoj Badale, one of the key figures behind Rajasthan Royals. The dispute centers on an 11.7% stake in the franchise’s holding structure and a settlement agreement signed several years ago.

Court Upholds EMV’s Termination of Settlement Agreement

The High Court ruled that EMV had lawfully terminated a 2019 settlement agreement with Raj Kundra after determining that he had breached its terms.

As a result, the court ordered:

  • Raj Kundra to pay $4.94 million to EMV.
  • Permanent enforcement of the settlement agreement.
  • A permanent anti-suit injunction preventing Kundra and Kuki Investments from pursuing related claims outside England.
  • Restrictions on filing connected proceedings before India’s NCLT or other overseas courts.

Court Ruling at a Glance

ItemDetails
CourtHigh Court of Justice of England and Wales
Amount payable$4.94 million
Winning partyEmerging Media Ventures (EMV)
Losing partyRaj Kundra and Kuki Investments
Additional orderPermanent anti-suit injunction

Dispute Revolved Around Rajasthan Royals Shareholding

The legal battle relates to an 11.7% shareholding in EM Sporting Holdings, the Mauritius-based entity through which EMV controlled Rajasthan Royals.

According to the judgment:

  • Kundra transferred the stake to EMV under a 2015 share transfer agreement.
  • A 2019 settlement agreement required him not to assert future ownership claims in return for a financial settlement.
  • The court found EMV was entitled to terminate that agreement, making the outstanding payment immediately due.

Timeline of the Dispute

YearDevelopment
2015Share transfer agreement executed
2019Settlement agreement signed
2026UK High Court orders $4.94 million payment

Anti-Suit Injunction Strengthens EMV’s Position

Beyond the financial award, the court granted EMV a permanent anti-suit injunction, preventing Kundra from attempting to reopen the dispute in other jurisdictions.

The injunction bars him from:

  • Initiating related proceedings before India’s NCLT.
  • Pursuing claims in courts outside England.
  • Challenging issues already covered by the English judgment.

Such injunctions are generally intended to prevent parallel litigation across multiple jurisdictions and ensure disputes governed by English law remain within the English courts.

Key Legal Outcomes

IssueCourt Decision
Settlement agreementValidly terminated by EMV
Outstanding paymentImmediately payable
Overseas litigationPermanently restrained
JurisdictionEngland retained exclusive authority

Ruling Comes After Rajasthan Royals Ownership Changes

The judgment arrives months after Rajasthan Royals underwent a major ownership change.

Earlier this year:

  • A consortium led by the Lakshmi Mittal family and Adar Poonawalla acquired a controlling stake in the IPL franchise.
  • The transaction reportedly valued Rajasthan Royals at around $1.65 billion, making it one of the highest-valued franchises in the league.

The court clarified that the present dispute concerns historical shareholding arrangements and settlement obligations rather than the franchise’s current ownership.

Looking Ahead

The High Court’s decision represents a significant legal setback for Raj Kundra, concluding a long-running dispute over his former shareholding in Rajasthan Royals’ holding structure. By upholding EMV’s termination of the 2019 settlement agreement, ordering a $4.94 million payment, and issuing a permanent anti-suit injunction, the court has reinforced the enforceability of the parties’ contractual commitments under English law.

While the ruling does not affect the current ownership or operations of Rajasthan Royals, it brings greater legal certainty to a dispute that has persisted for years. Any further action by Kundra would likely need to follow the legal avenues available under English law rather than through parallel proceedings in other jurisdictions.

Get the day’s top stories in your inbox

One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.