Thursday, December 18, 2025

Trending

Related Posts

Wow Momos win “WOW BURGER” trademark case

In a major legal development, WOW! Momo has achieved a favourable outcome in its trademark dispute with WOW Burger. The case, filed before the Delhi High Court, addressed whether the food-service brandโ€™s use of the word โ€œWOWโ€ in its name grants exclusive rights against others using similar marks. The decision has important implications for trademark law in India and brand strategies in the food-service sector.


What happened in the WOW Momo trademark case

  • WOW! Momo Foods Pvt. Ltd., which operates the popular quick-service restaurant chain, claimed that the Hong Kong-based company behind WOW Burger & Anr. was infringing its trademark rights by launching a burger business under the mark โ€œWOW Burgerโ€.
  • Initially, a single-judge bench of the Delhi High Court declined to grant an interim injunction in favour of WOW! Momo.
  • Subsequently, a division bench set aside that order and granted an interim injunction, restraining WOW Burger from using the mark, holding that there was a likelihood of confusion and that WOW! Momoโ€™s family of marks had acquired distinctiveness.

Key legal findings and reasoning

Distinctiveness and family of marks

The court found that while the standalone word โ€œWOWโ€ is a common English expression and cannot be exclusively appropriated, when combined with a food-item name (e.g., โ€œWOW! MOMOโ€, โ€œWOW! DIMSUMSโ€), the composite mark had acquired distinctiveness and goodwill in the Indian food-service market.

Infringement & deceptive similarity

The bench noted that an average consumer, aware of the WOW! Momo brand, might see โ€œWOW Burgerโ€ and assume an association or source link. This overlap in trade channel (quick-service food) strengthened the case for infringement under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

No exclusive rights over generic/exclamatory term

However, significantly, the court held that the word โ€œWOWโ€ by itself cannot be monopolised because it is laudatory and in wide use, and WOW! Momo itself had earlier accepted this by filing disclaimers stating no exclusive claim over โ€œWOW.โ€


Implications for the food-service and branding industry

  • Brand strategy matters: Companies relying on common words (like โ€œWOWโ€, โ€œGOODโ€, โ€œYUMโ€) should ensure the composite mark is distinctive and supported by consistent use and registration.
  • Trademark protection is not automatic: Merely using a word does not guarantee exclusive rightsโ€”distinctiveness and goodwill are essential.
  • Risk of overlap in common sectors: Quick-service chains often use similar names, so risk of consumer confusion is higherโ€”vigilance is required.
  • Importance of registrations & disclaimers: How a brand deals with applications (e.g., accepting disclaimers) can impact its later arguments in litigation.
  • India as a destination for trademark enforcement: With this decision, brand owners and challengers in India must factor in Indian courtsโ€™ interpretation of distinctiveness and infringement.

What this means for WOW! Momo and WOW Burger

For WOW! Momo, the interim injunction is a win that helps protect its branding and may deter further use of โ€œWOW + food itemโ€ by competitors without licensing. For WOW Burger, the decision means they must either change their mark, reach a settlement, or defend the case at full trialโ€”risking injunction and costs.


Background on the brands

WOW! Momo, founded in 2008, is a rapidly growing Indian quick-service restaurant chain specialising in momos.
WOW Burger is a newer entrant planning to operate in the Indian burger market, and the dispute arose when WOW! Momo discovered the planned use of โ€œWOW Burgerโ€ by the defendants in December 2024.


Conclusion

The legal victory in the WOW Momo trademark case demonstrates that while common words may not be protected on their own, a well-used and distinguished composite brand can secure strong enforcement rights. The focus keyword WOW Momo trademark case captures the significance of this ruling for brand-owners, legal practitioners and the food-service industry in India.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles